UBC Arts One
UBC Arts One
  • 52
  • 744 018
Arts One 50th promo
Come celebrate with us, as we commemorate 50 years of UBC Arts One
Переглядів: 1 489

Відео

Gavin Paul
Переглядів 5106 років тому
Gavin Paul
Robert Crawford
Переглядів 3 тис.6 років тому
Robert Crawford
Brianne Orr-Alvarez
Переглядів 3376 років тому
Brianne Orr-Alvarez
Carrie Jenkins
Переглядів 1,2 тис.6 років тому
Carrie Jenkins
Siobhan McElduff
Переглядів 5016 років тому
Siobhan McElduff
Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish
Переглядів 75 тис.8 років тому
In this lecture for Arts One at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC, Canada, Christina Hendricks discusses Foucault’s argument in Parts One (on the spectacle of public execution) and Three (on discipline and panopticism) of Foucault’s Discipline and Punish. She begins by talking about Foucault’s views of power, the relationship between power and knowledge, and his idea of his po...
Dr. Caligari, Nosferatu, Dr. Mabuse The Gamber
Переглядів 2,3 тис.8 років тому
This is a lecture for Arts One at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC. In it, Jason Lieblang discusses some aspects of the social, political, and cultural history of the Weimar Republic in Germany and expressionism in cinema. He then focuses on vision in Wiene's Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, Murnau's Nosferatu, and Lang's Dr. Mabuse, the Gambler. He also talks briefly about Grune's D...
German Novellen: Kleist, Tieck, Grimm
Переглядів 1,5 тис.8 років тому
In this lecture for Arts One at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC, Canada, Jason Lieblang discusses the 18th & 19th century German Novelle, focusing on Henrich von Kleist's "The Earthquake in Chile," Ludwig Tieck's "Fair-Haired Eckbert," and the Brothers Grimm, "Little Snow-White." The CC license for this video is CC BY-NC 4.0 (UA-cam doesn't provide this as a choice): creativ...
Sigmund Freud and E.T.A. Hoffmann
Переглядів 10 тис.8 років тому
This is a lecture for Arts One at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC, Canada in November, 2015. Christina Hendricks spends the first half talking about Freud's Interpretation of Dreams and "Leonardo da Vinci" essay, and in the second half Jason Lieblang talks about Freud's "The Uncanny" essay and E.T.A. Hoffmann's "The Sandman." The CC license for this video is CC BY-NC 4.0 (UA...
Hobbes, Leviathan: The Monster in the Machine (Oct. 2015)
Переглядів 2,6 тис.8 років тому
In this lecture for the Arts One Program at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, BC, Canada, Christina Hendricks discusses - Hobbes' method of starting with clear definitions, then moving to statements, then syllogisms - Some of the historical background to the text (events leading up to the English Civil War, disputes between Parliament and King Charles I) - The sovereign as Leviat...
McNeilly Watchmen Lecture March 2015
Переглядів 1,3 тис.9 років тому
In this lecture for Arts One (artsone.arts.ubc.ca) at the University of British Columbia, Kevin McNeilly begins by talking about the material nature of the text, its physicality and structure, distinguishing it from the linear and confining movement of film. The collaborative nature of graphic novels resists a single, authorial intention or perspective, as does the juxtaposition of the ordered,...
Beauvoir, The Second Sex, and Gilman, The Yellow Wall-Paper
Переглядів 14 тис.9 років тому
This is a lecture on these two texts for Arts One at the University of British Columbia-Vancouver (Canada). Derek Gladwin begins this lecture by talking about the various "waves" of feminism in the West, then discusses how woman has become the "other," according to Beauvoir. He then gives some background on S. Weir Mitchell, the doctor who treated Gilman (and whom she mentions in "The Yellow Wa...
Francis Ford Coppola, Apocalypse Now (lecture)
Переглядів 2,9 тис.9 років тому
In this lecture for Arts One at the University of British Columbia, Derek Gladwin talks about the degree to which this film revisits Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness and deviates from it (the students had just read Conrad's novella), the style of filmaking that this film could be said to fit into, the historical and cultural context of the film, and cultural and literary references in the film...
Sigmund Freud, Civilization and its Discontents
Переглядів 58 тис.9 років тому
Christina Hendricks begins this lecture by giving some background in a few Freudian ideas and arguments that may help in making sense of the text, and then talks about connections between this text, Rousseau's Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, Plato's Republic, and Nietzsche's Twilight of the Idols, while giving her reading of some of the main points of Freud's arguments. She ends with a q...
Ian Hacking, Rewriting the Soul
Переглядів 3,8 тис.9 років тому
Ian Hacking, Rewriting the Soul
Hobbes, Leviathan (lecture 2, 2014)
Переглядів 1,2 тис.9 років тому
Hobbes, Leviathan (lecture 2, 2014)
Plato's Republic, Politics and Ethics
Переглядів 3,6 тис.9 років тому
Plato's Republic, Politics and Ethics
Margaret Atwood, The Penelopiad
Переглядів 19 тис.9 років тому
Margaret Atwood, The Penelopiad
Francis Ford Coppola, Apocalypse Now
Переглядів 11 тис.10 років тому
Francis Ford Coppola, Apocalypse Now
Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex
Переглядів 101 тис.10 років тому
Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex
Chinua Achebe, Things Fall Apart
Переглядів 20 тис.10 років тому
Chinua Achebe, Things Fall Apart
Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman
Переглядів 16 тис.10 років тому
Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman
Ian Hacking, Rewriting the Soul
Переглядів 2,8 тис.10 років тому
Ian Hacking, Rewriting the Soul
Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality: An Introduction
Переглядів 146 тис.10 років тому
Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality: An Introduction
Frantz Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks
Переглядів 25 тис.10 років тому
Frantz Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks
Sigmund Freud, Dora: An Analysis of a Case of Hysteria
Переглядів 19 тис.10 років тому
Sigmund Freud, Dora: An Analysis of a Case of Hysteria
Aimé Césaire, The Tragedy of King Christophe, and Derek Walcott, King Christophe
Переглядів 5 тис.10 років тому
Aimé Césaire, The Tragedy of King Christophe, and Derek Walcott, King Christophe

КОМЕНТАРІ

  • @bubbaliburtee8657
    @bubbaliburtee8657 19 годин тому

    Groomers detected

  • @justchill135
    @justchill135 День тому

    I am not sure what her point is. The text reveals alot about Freud being forgetful and having unfinished works? Sounds ridiculous. Probably her Masters thesis or something. Good lecture otherwise. The lsd comment sounds entirely wrong.

  • @petersantospago1966
    @petersantospago1966 6 днів тому

    You're a sexy lecturer... Especially on civilization and its discontents...

  • @hecoppiii
    @hecoppiii Місяць тому

    Thank you for sharing this

  • @Karan.says.
    @Karan.says. Місяць тому

    I watched the second sex lecture...very interesting

  • @kk-om5zm
    @kk-om5zm 2 місяці тому

    Just one word........Rosaria Butterfield........

  • @williamwilson3458
    @williamwilson3458 3 місяці тому

    Uh…. Uh….. Uh….Uhm….

  • @ramkrishnadutta8836
    @ramkrishnadutta8836 4 місяці тому

    can I somehow get that handout?

  • @palefire
    @palefire 4 місяці тому

    Beautiful. Thankyou.

  • @malvikapant7622
    @malvikapant7622 6 місяців тому

    Anybody's else found it repetitive after second half of video

  • @user-yh9sn1ye1j
    @user-yh9sn1ye1j 7 місяців тому

    Can't wait for the Jimmy saville and gary glitter lectures More noncesense. Bravo

  • @johngulino2651
    @johngulino2651 8 місяців тому

    I don’t think the camera ought to be positioned so far in the back of the room. It appears as if this room is a prison cell, and she is a prisoner.

  • @wordscapes5690
    @wordscapes5690 8 місяців тому

    “Sexual choices” 😂

  • @Xcalator35
    @Xcalator35 9 місяців тому

    This lady should lear something about Foucault!! She says he was always 'very left'!! Wrong!!! After his very brief flirt with the Communist Party (something almost ALL french intelectuals did at that time) he became a fierce anti-communist and anti-marxist. He considered himself as being right-wing and a gaulist until the events of May 68 when he 'mutated' into a maoist for some time. By the time he died he had shifted again, this time into pro-capitalist liberalism!!

    • @francescocerasuolo4064
      @francescocerasuolo4064 29 днів тому

      very based! the left shouldn't be monopolized by Marxists, Communists, Stalinists and Maoists, who have been good for nothing but repress our liberties!

  • @Xcalator35
    @Xcalator35 9 місяців тому

    This lady is really bad!! She even had to check in her notes what 'voyarism' is for god sake!!!!!!!

  • @AnimatedHooman
    @AnimatedHooman 9 місяців тому

    I so wanna be in this class and have like multiple cups of coffee and make sure I understand every word

  • @bjpafa2293
    @bjpafa2293 10 місяців тому

    Congrats. Clear, concise, accurate, thank you. A privilege, to be aware of your line of thought.

  • @yaoi_ibuprofen
    @yaoi_ibuprofen 10 місяців тому

    >:3

  • @franzliszt3195
    @franzliszt3195 10 місяців тому

    Wasteland stinks.

  • @lifeisabadjoke5750
    @lifeisabadjoke5750 10 місяців тому

    I would of made that teacher pregnant

  • @dandantheman7493
    @dandantheman7493 11 місяців тому

    It's important to note that Foucault lived and taught in Tunisia for a brief period of time before 1968. He supported the revolutionary activities of some students and even went to prison in place of a student who was arrested while protesting. This should be set against the protests of 1968, yes, but also the October massacre of several Algerians protesting French presence in Algeria (which Foucault and many other French intellectuals did not acknowledge).

  • @yoojinoh4766
    @yoojinoh4766 11 місяців тому

    1:15:37

  • @yoojinoh4766
    @yoojinoh4766 11 місяців тому

    54:12

  • @yp77738yp77739
    @yp77738yp77739 Рік тому

    A female teaching philosophy, that’s novel. Maybe because what she is teaching is nonsense at source.

  • @trentw.3566
    @trentw.3566 Рік тому

    Her lectures are awesome. Great speaker and thinker.

  • @A_Distant_Life
    @A_Distant_Life Рік тому

    Was this shot in a prison?

  • @JCloyd-ys1fm
    @JCloyd-ys1fm Рік тому

    Very useful lecture. Thank you…

  • @zahrahassan6883
    @zahrahassan6883 Рік тому

    👍

  • @satyendrasinghbhadauriya
    @satyendrasinghbhadauriya Рік тому

    I am from India In my view, without Sigmund Freud, no subject and dimension can be properly explained.Sigmund Freud is the best intellectual and genius ever born

  • @julianbutler3950
    @julianbutler3950 Рік тому

    My left ear enjoyed this

  • @nhzsk7236
    @nhzsk7236 Рік тому

    Abject Non-sense.... so easy to under cut him.

  • @albanbokshi4818
    @albanbokshi4818 Рік тому

    Does anyone know which Foucault interview from 1983 she is quoting? Around 18:00 - 19:00.

  • @Worshipsatch
    @Worshipsatch Рік тому

    Thank you for the upload! Give a like if you too googled Foucault with hair during the lecture 😂 for one I would have to disagree about Foucault's science of sex, i mean scientific studies initially were very much inclined against sex, not promoting it. For the latter part, the scientific gaze worked as a shield for any personal involvement or 'confession', which hid the desires of the researcher. It is only the third party interpretation of empirical results that led to the promotion of sex in the modern world. Yet, it couldn't do away with the dogma that was outside the bounds of empirical analysis. Look at the sad defeat of Pro Sex feminism in te 1980s for example, just after the so called 'sexual revolution', which had failed before.

  • @chickenwing27
    @chickenwing27 Рік тому

    “Vaginal discharge. Well, that one’s not so bad “ 😂😂😂

  • @md.rakibhossain9532
    @md.rakibhossain9532 Рік тому

    Thank you for sharing such a great lecture.

  • @barbarajohnson1442
    @barbarajohnson1442 Рік тому

    Ooooh I wish I could view you teaching a Yeats course! Loved your TS Eliot. I bet you might enjoy the new book by David Graeber, the Dawn of Everything. Glad to know of you.

  • @barbarajohnson1442
    @barbarajohnson1442 Рік тому

    Really a rich commentary, wonderful! Thank you.

  • @ekteboi4179
    @ekteboi4179 Рік тому

    I think an important nuance at 24:08 is that our will to knowledge is not so much a want for knowledge because sexuality is important for us, but the willing into existence of ''knowledge'' out of sheer will for power. We produce ''knowledge'' about it in order to obtain power over it. That knowledge is not the actual truth.

  • @carlroberts4963
    @carlroberts4963 Рік тому

    Ì sawttm tirty y

  • @lauratonkin1932
    @lauratonkin1932 Рік тому

    Hello, the link to the Prezi is no longer working. Is it possible to share again? I am teaching Apocalypse Now as an adaptation of Heart of Darkness to my senior students in high school and would appreciate a link to the Prezi if at all possible. Thank you!

  • @thetruthoutside8423
    @thetruthoutside8423 Рік тому

    But why sexuality is hidden? Why aren't we just like other species? Why everything has to be complicated by us? The problem of awareness, I think, added more complicated issues to us, since we are aware of our inner self and not having any access to it. We all the time ACTING, HIDING AND ACTING . maybe civilization itself caused this problem too.

    • @NotRegret
      @NotRegret 11 місяців тому

      This is the type of question that I think most people should have just figured out by growing up. Civilization does "cause these problems" because you can only maintain civilization if sex is handled in a certain way. Only monogamous cultures can be maintained. There have been cultures that tried to other things and they grew weak and were easily defeated. So all sexual values are about maintaining monogamy. If you want to be a slut you have to do it unseen where it will not weaken higher values.

  • @thetruthoutside8423
    @thetruthoutside8423 Рік тому

    Well, fair enough 👏, ending his life that way. Maybe he had disgusted with life and the suffering it brings to an individuals. All what we have known is suffering, suffering with birth and suffering with death and a lots of suffering while we are a life. And still people want to assume that there is life after death and still want to life it. I think they should read the epic of Gilgamesh and how he gave a brilliant answer to whoever wants to leave forever.

  • @mlem474
    @mlem474 Рік тому

    Grazie

  • @archakgorai5181
    @archakgorai5181 Рік тому

    its a caveat chekhov said the sign of reading in act 1 shouldgo on inact

  • @archakgorai5181
    @archakgorai5181 Рік тому

    we are puy into a sense of abyss lewis carrols rabit hole we never come to afinal frameand stay in the middle

  • @archakgorai5181
    @archakgorai5181 Рік тому

    there is a sense of nesting in the story

  • @archakgorai5181
    @archakgorai5181 Рік тому

    there is extraordinary sense of fidelity

  • @archakgorai5181
    @archakgorai5181 Рік тому

    he has got a strange hunch

  • @archakgorai5181
    @archakgorai5181 Рік тому

    there is whole series of repetitions

  • @archakgorai5181
    @archakgorai5181 Рік тому

    the novel forces us to read the words there is condenssation of image novels has monopoly of narrative